Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Martini & The Bone Palace Orchestra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Babajobu 11:28, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Martini & The Bone Palace Orchestra[edit]

166 Google hits, fails WP:MUSIC. Daniel Case 07:00, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per NN. Arbustoo 09:33, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Ruby 14:31, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This garbage had me cracking up something fierce: "Martin Martini and the Bone Palace Orchestra is a tight, travelling band of freaks, misfits, and creatures, bound together by fate, music and the knowledge bone deep that they can never go home." Sounds like this bunch of carnies digs Hunter S. Thompson. BrianGCrawfordMA 15:47, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The band meets the criteria: Has been the subject of a half hour or hour broadcast on a national radio network. (PBS, Jul 19 2005). The band has also received been featured prominently in the Australian music press (have posted a link to one online article). I have also removed the offending promotional line, cited by BrianGCrawfordMA, and entered a more suitable introduction. Adynata 15:55, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless the claim by Adynata is verified. Stifle 20:56, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
KeepThey have featured in the Australian press predominatley, you can view this by clicking on the google link search at the top.
Martin Martini has also been nominated for a Greenroom Award, which IMO should satisfy WP:MUSIC Has written a song or composition which has won or placed in a major music competition not established expressly for new comers.. I'd like to add that this is an Australian artist and the presumption that they are not "notable" simply because they haven't featured in or Rolling Stone or Pitchfork suggests bias and disregard for Australian musical culture.</rant> Adynata 04:01, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 04:01, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.