Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Dvořák

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:41, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Dvořák[edit]

Martin Dvořák (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find evidence that meets WP:ENT. CapitalSasha ~ talk 03:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:47, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:47, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, Dvořák is professional ballet dancer, not a mainstream "entertainer", but it is possible to find interviews and articles about him in reliable and independent specialized sources such as divadelni-noviny.cz, casopisharmonie.cz operaplus.cz tanecniaktuality.cz. All the sources are in Czech but I'm a native speaker of Czech and I'm quite familiar with the topic so I can confirm that i.e. Divadelní noviny or Harmonie (links mentioned above) are notable Czech magazines focusing on theatre, classical music and ballet. Dvořák collaborated with multiple notable artists and ensembles and he was also nominated for Thalia Award in 2000. There's enough material to compile a decent and well referenced article about him. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 17:35, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per above. With Chrome's translation function, it's pretty clear as Vejvančický says that we do have enough RS and he is a notable figure in Czech dance. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:09, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.