Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martha Smith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. slakr^\ talk / 06:03, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Martha Smith[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not sufficiently notable. Minor actress and Playboy Playmate monthly,not even annual, 40 years ago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alicebluegown (talk • contribs) 15:13, 8 March 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Content has a place on Wikipedia. The separate question is whether she deserves a stand-alone article, or if this text should be merged into List of Playboy Playmates of 1973. However, that would be a merge discussion, not a deletion discussion. (In that regard, I lean toward keeping the separate page, because of her post-Playboy acting and TV work.) —C.Fred (talk) 15:19, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. C. Fred's analysis is on target, and the subject's mainstream film/TV would likely support an independent article even if she weren't a playmate. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:55, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A second-tier role in the iconic Animal House plus her TV work satisfy WP:NACTOR. (Then there's her Universal Studios tour guide gig.) Clarityfiend (talk) 02:19, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A minor actress in one role. The Animal House role was a minor supporting role, it is not enough to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:31, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.