Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mars Simulation Project

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Fences&Windows 00:20, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mars Simulation Project[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find significant coverage for this video game. Joe Chill (talk) 00:14, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:12, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - an interesting piece of software, I wish it well, however at this time it does not meet verifiability requirements. Marasmusine (talk) 13:24, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is it the same as this one described by ABC News? SharkD Talk 22:30, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Nevermind. The project I linked to is not a piece of software. SharkD Talk 22:33, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
A google search reveals references to the game on several websites, I don't see why it should be deleted.Sturm55 (talk) 16:34, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Are any of the websites independent, reliable sources? All I see are sourceforge, blog, and directory hits. Marasmusine (talk) 12:13, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
weak delete I see a lot of directory hits and several primary sources but I cannot find a good reliable source providing significant coverage. Polargeo (talk) 11:58, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.