Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marrickville greens
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Greens New South Wales. Cirt (talk) 09:26, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Marrickville greens[edit]
- Marrickville greens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Articles on suburban branches of minor political parties are not notable. Grahame (talk) 03:53, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 03:53, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CLUB "Individual chapters of national and international organizations are usually not notable". WWGB (talk) 04:57, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence that they're a notable chapter of a party. As noted above, local chapters generally do not warrant their own articles. —C.Fred (talk) 05:57, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 06:55, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Nick-D (talk) 10:25, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Greens New South Wales. The state party is notable, individual branches are not. Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:08, 14 June 2009 (UTC).[reply]
- Redirect and Merge to/with NSW Greens per Lankiveil. GetDumb 09:28, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.