Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marriage in the world

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted by User:Jimfbleak at 19:01 on 21 March 2011 and possibly by User:Zzyzx11 at 6:02 on 22 March 2011. Mandsford 12:45, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marriage in the world[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. I repeat the reason behind the PROD: Copy paste from Conservapedia and opinion based information. –MuZemike 18:44, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete. Article is nothing but a POV fork describing the article creator's views on marriage. The title is misleading - my first impression was that it would contain various cultures' views on marriage, but I landed on this copy-paste job from Conservapedia. I don't see any way this could become useful for Wikipedia. Zakhalesh (talk) 18:50, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree Article is POV and copy paste from another site. Xionbox^₪ 19:00, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A10; "duplicates an existing English Wikipedia topic ... and does not expand upon, detail or improve information." 28bytes (talk) 19:16, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, opinion piece in violation of WP:NPOV and WP:NOR. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:29, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete POV copy paste with a misleading title. OSborn^arf_contribs. 00:48, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete entirely unsupported list of assertions. Francis Bond (talk) 07:47, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I see no evidence that it's a copy and paste job from anywhere, but this needs to go to Conservapedia, "The Trustworthy Encyclopedia" or some other site where POV is okay as long as it's a conservative POV. Mandsford 18:18, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.