Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marlise Keith

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. I'm withdrawing my nomination. SarahStierch (talk) 08:28, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Marlise Keith[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May fail our general notability guidelines. I struggled to discover multiple reliable sources, including as a WP:ARTIST, that weren't press releases, mere mentions, or from non reliable sources. SarahStierch (talk) 00:17, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Most artists will maintain press clippings and info at their website: Reviews. Two from Liechtenstein papers, three from Cape Times (South Africa) and one from Die Burger. In the bio section she says for 2010: "Afrikaan at Sarah Kahn Contemporary, Schaan Lichtenstein with reviews in the Volksblad. "Blight" at Wembly Square, Cape Town with reviews in the Cape Times, Die Burger and Big Issue and Fine Music Radio". She also claims reviews in the Cape Argus (2009), Die Beeld (2008), and "a review by Cobus van Bosch of the Burger" (2000). I'm willing to assume accurate claims that are verifiable. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 08:05, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw I'm going to close and withdraw this. Thanks GC. I rushed to judgement on this one. SarahStierch (talk) 08:28, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.