Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marleen Geelen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. -Docg 21:03, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Marleen Geelen[edit]
Selfpromotion. Simeon87 18:45, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete non notable (sorry Marleen!)Droliver 19:01, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Yes fails notablity criteria.Obina 21:28, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above. --Duke of Duchess Street 02:54, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete User has made same article on dutch wikipedia CE 20:45, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Advertising, and non-notable. This is the kind of stuff that gives Wikipedia a bad name. WMMartin 17:18, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.