Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markowicz Fine Art

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. While all the "keep" !votes were of the week variety, there has to be a firm consensus in favour of deletion for that to happen, and, after three weeks and two relists, that is not going to occur. (non-admin closure) ——Serial 15:56, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Markowicz Fine Art[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. No significant coverage in independent, reliable sources. Vexations (talk) 16:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 19:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 19:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep some of it is churnalism, but there's some coverage, including artnet and other art papers. I think it passes WP:ORG, barely StarM 20:10, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Star Mississippi, are you referring to this article by artnet? All that had to say about the subject is "Start your journey in the Miami Design District at Markowicz Fine Art, which is presenting new sculptures in the highly anticipated exhibition of French artist Alain Godon". How does that pass WP:ORG? Vexations (talk) 16:02, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- - Vexations I saw a couple more, that I will add if I can. Just didn't have a chance to in limited time online yesterday. It's thin, but I think it may just pass the barrier. StarM 19:29, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:55, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, has been written up in news/magazines/sources but of MFA itself only appear to be mentions ie. "if you want to see .... go to MFA or .... can be seen/now showing at MFA" kind of words, where are the sources/articles that actually analyse the exhibitions/shows held there? Coolabahapple (talk) 15:31, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:54, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:36, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: A collection of weak sources, 16 on a stub-class article, can mean citation overkill but it can also mean better sourcs can be found. If I am going to give consideration to deleting articles on the arts I am going to look closely at the single sourced, out dated (possibly closed, possibly relocated, and certainly renamed), Dorsch gallery. -- Otr500 (talk) 20:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.