Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marketing Solution Group

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 12:03, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Marketing Solution Group[edit]

Marketing Solution Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG HUJUMA (talk) 09:25, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep with edit. Some section sounds like product selling page. But the information may be valuable to local people.nirmal (talk) 09:55, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - blatantly promotional and obviously created by a marketer. Deb (talk) 10:02, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Promo piece. User spamublocked. -- Alexf(talk) 10:31, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - promotional piece, badly written, doesn't pass WP:CORPDEPTH. Stlwart111 10:36, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - spammy and non-notable Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:27, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete agree with Stalwart111 st170etalk 16:46, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete This probably should be SPEEDY DELETEd. Promotional and fails WP:N. --Clean-up-wiki-guy (talk) 22:18, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:45, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.