Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Markazi Imambargah Shah e Najaf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:43, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Markazi Imambargah Shah e Najaf[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources, no relevant non-Wikipedia Google hits: Content is unverifiable, topic probably non-notable. Article was prodded for those concerns, but the only source added when the prod was removed was a primary source, probably not reliable, that cannot bestow notability. Huon (talk) 15:14, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been moved to Shah e Najaf which generates much more Google hits, but unfortunately still no reliable sources relevant to this Imambargah. If the article were to be kept, disambiguation would probably require a more specific title since "Shah e Najaf" seesm a common name for various religious centres. Huon (talk) 17:16, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I have tried my best to address your concerns because I also believe in authenticity of an article for the viewers. I appreciate your concern that the name "Shah e Najaf" refers to various other religious centres, but I should be encouraged that, I brought up this Shah e Najaf on wikipedia along with its entire information of where it exists. No disambiguation will occur because this place is Central place whereas other articles, if published, will have to use specific titles in future. I have clearly mentioned its existence in the main city of Hyderabad, Sindh. I have mentioned Shah e Najaf as "Markazi Imambargah" which means central Imambargah in the city of Hyderabad, Sindh and as well as Pakistan. Therefore it is requested to remove the tag for deletion from this article. Thanks.--Shahenshahkillz (talk) 07:52, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the article to Shah e Najaf, Hyderabad per Huon's concern. --SMS ^Talk 09:29, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable. I am unable to find a reliable source for the subject article. --SMS ^Talk 09:45, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete. This article has got some reliable sources.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 17:31, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.