Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Zito
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 23:43, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mark Zito[edit]
- Mark Zito (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Biographical article on a subject who does not meet notability requirements. All cited sources are either authored by the subject first-hand or about shows which the subject was in. It would seem the subject created and updates the page himself. Michaeld366 (talk) 16:57, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:13, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. None of the sources cited in the article meet the WP:GNG criterion of independent in-depth coverage. A Google search for ("mark zito") turned up nothing that would satisfy the criterion; refining it to ("mark zito" radio) in order to rule out hits pertaining to other Mark Zitos didn't yield anything more. A Google News search for ("mark zito" radio) produced only one hit, and it was about a different Mark Zito. The best I could come up with was a few articles from Syracuse University media; they didn't cover Zito in any kind of depth, and, in any case, coverage of a local media figure doesn't indicate wider notability. Ammodramus (talk) 20:35, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Ammodramus. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 23:36, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.