Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Velazquez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I will move to draft space upon request if someone will commit to improving this text. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 05:54, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Velazquez[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly referenced BLP. I dream of horses (T) @ 19:21, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move to draft to allow time for better sourcing. This seems to be by a well-intentioned newbie. I can't tell if the subject is notable or not, yet. DES ^(talk) 21:25, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now and draft & userfy only if necessary as the common name was not easy to help search and there's simply nothing to suggest keeping. SwisterTwister talk 21:56, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A Google search for ""Mark Velazquez" musician" doesn't return much that would help to establish notability, but the "M." alter ego complicates matters. I have removed unsourced material about his sexuality from the article. Cordless Larry (talk) 21:57, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
delete or userfy - i have found nothing about a musician / producer of the name Mark Velazquez. if there is stuff under the name M., there is no sourcing that connects it to Mark Velazquez and so the article would be M. (musician). -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 22:23, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.