Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Tuan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Got7. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 03:11, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Tuan[edit]

Mark Tuan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As a biography this is terrible--there simply is no sourcing for it, and little wonder, since this person is simply not notable outside of the boys group that he is a member of. Drmies (talk) 06:49, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (post) @ 21:20, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (quip) @ 21:20, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • If he doesn't merit his own article apart from his band, his name is still a reasonable search term so redirect to Got7 (as should be done with all similarly situated band members). postdlf (talk) 22:20, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • postdlf, given the edit warring and other problems in the K-pop area, on occasion I choose AfD. I'm fine with a redirect, of course. Drmies (talk) 04:31, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Got7. No notability outside the group. --Random86 (talk) 01:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Got7. No notability outside the group. We're seeing a huge flood of Got7-related articles and a lot of edit warring on their pages. Shinyang-i (talk) 01:49, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Got7. No notability outside the group. We're seeing a huge flood of Got7-related articles and a lot of edit warring on their pages.(Mrchurang (talk) 17:20, 1 January 2015 (UTC))[reply]
  • Redirect per above.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  10:24, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect per above Asdklf; (talk) 23:01, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect.  B E C K Y S A Y L E 02:44, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.