Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Simmons (comedian)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Only Keep !vote was predicated on article being improved, which has not happened. Yunshui  11:39, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Simmons (comedian)[edit]

Mark Simmons (comedian) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not seeing enough independent coverage to meet WP:GNG nor claims that clearly meet WP:NBIO. Searching online, I was able to find some trivial coverage but nothing significant, although the presence of search results about other individuals by this name could have led to me missing something. That having been said, based on what I was able to find, I think that this may be a case of WP:TOOSOON signed, Rosguill talk 20:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 20:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 20:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 20:30, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:18, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♠ 02:31, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • In response to the keep vote before the relist, I'm not seeing anything in the first few pages of search results that would help get this article to HEY standards. There's a lot of false positives, and the few results that are actually about this subject looked trivial/routine. signed, Rosguill talk 02:45, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.