Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Shankland (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus that GNG is met Nosebagbear (talk) 11:36, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Shankland[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The player fails WP:FPL as he hasn't played in the top two leagues. HawkAussie (talk) 10:10, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 10:10, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 10:10, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. HawkAussie (talk) 10:10, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 12:22, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - meets WP:GNG based on the sources in the article, including two separate full-length articles about him from the Daily Record (a national newspaper) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:28, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as pointed out by Chris, this article already passes GNG from the sources provided in the article itself; I count at least 4 reliable sources providing extensive coverage Spiderone 12:52, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He may not meet the thematic criteria, but meets WP:GNG, given the existence of multiple sources with extensive coverage. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 13:51, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - a player cannot fail FPL; a player can fail WP:NFOOTBALL which refers to FPL. Anyway, as noted above, GNg is met, which is more important. Giant Snowman 16:58, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - He has been the subject of significant coverage, not least due to the young age in which he made his senior debut and the interest he attracted from significant clubs when he was a teenager. Even playing at junior level he has still attracted a fair level of coverage. So to my mind he passes general notability criteria. Dunarc (talk) 23:59, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:13, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:SIGCOV Jenyire2 (talk) 07:07, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.