Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Porter (visual artist)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Mark Porter (visual artist)[edit]
- Mark Porter (visual artist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No reliable sources found to verify notability. I denied a CSD:A7 due to a perceived claim of importance ("... known for ..."), however all subsequent content edits appear to be a conflict of interest, calling into question the identity of the original creator. — X S G 05:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - as nom. — X S G 05:40, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:02, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 13:02, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Young artist, NN so far. Johnbod (talk) 15:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Hm. Wim Delvoye meets Fischli & Weiss. He'll become notable. Isn't yet however. Good luck. Enki H. (talk) 05:03, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom...Modernist (talk) 17:15, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.