Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Mercedes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 17:15, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Mercedes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability has not been established for three months. Some controversial claims need cites and they haven't been forthcoming. Fails WP:N and WP:GNG. 101.172.213.57 (talk) 21:20, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the one source provided is very weak, proving that Mercedes exists but not much else. Notability most definitely not established. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:26, 28 December 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Delete, notability has not been established.LM2000 (talk) 01:58, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The website used for the sole source is currently suspended - not a good indication of it being reliable! The subject appears to fail general notability guidelines. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 18:53, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.