Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Heller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 15:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Heller[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking GHits of substance and with zero GNEWS. Appears to fail WP:BIO. ttonyb (talk) 21:57, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ per lack of sources to establish notability. Alison22 (talk) 00:30, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: Alison22 has been indef blocked as sockpuppet. Pcap ping 02:28, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Striking vote of blocked sock puppet. J04n(talk page) 03:18, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above, he also failsWP:ENT for lack of "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." His best show might be as a director, yet these look like small, non-notable productions. --Glenfarclas (talk) 01:05, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:03, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - just barely fails WP:ENT, in my opinion. I could see him meeting it in the future, but what I see on imdb just doesn't cut it for me, personally. He's getting there, but I don't think he's notable enough under WP:ENT yet. Cocytus [»talk«] 13:37, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.