Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Feigenbaum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 15:12, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Feigenbaum[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Non notable by definition. Reference's are for the most part name drops scope_creep (talk) 06:57, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:47, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:47, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:47, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:48, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Source searches are providing name checks and passing mentions, but nothing of substance about the subject himself. Also qualifies for deletion as per WP:NOTRESUME. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:49, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Question. Does being appointed FCPA satisfy ANYBIO #1 or the "fellow" criteria of PROF? If not, why not? James500 (talk) 00:58, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. No. These are industrial certifications, signifying length of experience, usually 15 years, and you automatically become a fellow if you can prove you've had 15 years of good experience. Fellow in the above instance you have mentioned, is being elected into a learned society. The process is of election by a peer group. It is much more stringent, with your whole work experience and quality of that experience checked by the peer group committee, and then the election is taken place. But it is more than that. The crux of it is the question of creation or discovery of something that never existed before, e.g. electricity. Accountancy is an industrial practice, that uses industrial processes, that have underwent quick evolution at the beginning and largely became unchanged, as they were proven to work. For the Fellows of the Royal Society, it is new. One example that struck me, was a programme about how the small red breasted bird species called the Robin get around. It uses spooky action at distance to navigate. The person who discovered that is likely to become a Fellow and get an article on here. Hope that helps. scope_creep (talk) 06:05, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.