Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Faje

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 01:33, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Faje[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. All the sources on Google I was able to find were original research or unreliable. Only 15,700 google hits. Perseus8235 (talk) 18:57, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep per multiple appearances on late-night talk shows, but weak because I'm not seeing much in the way of WP:RS for anything besides appearances. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:12, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep, no citations at all, but plenty of ghits some of which I think might qualify as a 'cult following' per WP:ENT #2. Marginal but I'd give it benefit of the doubt and hope someone does a refimprove.--ThePaintedOne (talk) 21:06, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

>*Delete He was a former contestant on "America's Got Talent". These people usually get a short bursts of coverage and then the world moves on to the next person. I can't find anything to suggest that this person will have the sustained coverage needed to show long-term notability. Travelbird (talk) 00:41, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I found sources which confirm his existence, but nothing giving significant coverage. PhilKnight (talk) 00:59, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.