Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Curtis (Footballer)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 20:56, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Mark Curtis (Footballer)[edit]
- Mark Curtis (Footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This article has been nominated for speedy deletion and PRODded, but the tags were removed without a reason given, by the creator. This shows no notability. Boleyn (talk) 23:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. пﮟოьεԻ 57 12:52, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As a semi-professional footballer who has not even played at the eighth level in England, he fails WP:ATHLETE. пﮟოьεԻ 57 12:52, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails notability criteria. Dancarney (talk) 12:58, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - a playing career at a lowly amateur level and working for a pro club in an obscure back-office role do not add up to notability.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:00, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Hasn't achieved notoriety per nom and above comments. --ClubOranjeTalk 13:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not notable. Kennedy (talk) 13:11, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:ATHLETE. GiantSnowman 13:35, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Certainly fails player notability standards, and the only thing remotely interesting (his job at Cardiff City) doesn't confer notability in this field. Bettia (rawr!) 11:10, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.