Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Clarke (Politician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, speedy deleted under G4 as it was a recreation of deleted material. AngelOfSadness talk 18:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Clarke (Politician)[edit]

Article's subject is currently a candidate for an election, with no claim of notability beyond that. Per WP:POLITICIAN, people only notable for candidacy in an election are not notable enough to warrant an article. No bias against recreation if he wins the election. TN‑X-Man 16:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable at present Mayalld (talk) 16:18, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability not established per WP:POLITICIAN. Mark Clarke's RS coverage comes from being a prospective candidate for the past 13 months. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
An article about this individual was previously deleted via a deletion discussion when named Mark Clarke (politician) (AfD here). Gr1st (talk) 18:25, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Per this information, I have tagged the article for speedy deletion G4, recreation of deleted material. TN‑X-Man 18:29, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.