Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Bergman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:24, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Bergman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a single-market radio and television personality, with no evidence of the reliable source coverage needed to clear WP:GNG -- of the four sources here, one is a YouTube video in which he's the interviewer and not the guest, one is a press release from his own employer, and two are blog entries. And there's also a possible conflict of interest here, as the creator's username was "Talkradio" and they've never once edited anything else on Wikipedia but Bergman and the radio station he works for. As always, local radio personalities are not automatically entitled to articles just because they exist (no, not even if they get promoted to program director) -- they must be the subject of enough reliable source coverage to clear GNG as more than just locally known in one city. Bearcat (talk) 16:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:10, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:11, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:11, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator. 2001:569:70DD:7500:39EA:19D8:DF90:EF4D (talk) 23:56, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947^{^{^(c)}} 00:26, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is not enough reliable sources and fails GNG. 108.172.69.77 (talk) 00:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:32, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.