Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Ashley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 12:54, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Ashley[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Awards are scene related or in niche categories, such as "Unsung swordsman", not meeting WP:PORNBIO. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:07, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:07, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:54, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:54, 12 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 20:43, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. "Unsung" performer awards indicate the general lack of reliable source coverage of the subject and their work, which translates to a lack of notability. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 23:04, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.