Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marjorie Raistrick-Carter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to List of Olympic female artistic gymnasts for Great Britain. Star Mississippi 02:42, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Marjorie Raistrick-Carter[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not have the significant coverage to meet the GNG nor WP:NGYMNAST. All I could find is this - [[1]] Let'srun (talk) 15:08, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Sportspeople, Women, and England. Let'srun (talk) 15:08, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Olympedia piece is decent. I would expect there to be further coverage available for this multi-time Olympian from an English-speaking country. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:54, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Aside from the usual snippets in contemporary sports reports, there's a little bit of significant coverage: marriage report, comeback in 1963. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 17:02, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Olympics-related deletion discussions. Ingratis (talk) 01:51, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:23, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Olympic female artistic gymnasts for Great Britain Coverage in databases is not considered sufficient to show WP notability. In 1952 she finished 131st out of 134 in the women's all around and in 1960 she finished 110th out of 124. Since Olympic participation is no longer enough to show notability, we need more coverage. Failing to break the top 100 is not enough. Papaursa (talk) 23:21, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.