Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario Herbert
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:13, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Mario Herbert[edit]
- Mario Herbert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:29, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, who? TV | talk 18:25, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Obviously a case of too soon, his first official album is scheduled for release next month and Google News provided nothing relevant. It appears the only links I have found are affiliated with the subject. Mario Herbert is not notable at this time. SwisterTwister talk 21:04, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:07, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Barbados-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:07, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Yeah, a clear case of WP:TOOSOON. I'd advise the author to try again in a few months once there's an actual discography out. Faustus37 (talk) 02:05, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Too soon to have an article. He still hasn't released anything or has been notable enough to grant an article. — ΛΧΣ21™ 16:35, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.