Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marina World

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:24, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Marina World[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A7. No indication of importance, A3. No content Carwile2 (talk) 22:53, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:03, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:03, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:04, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Claim that the article has "no content" is patently incorrect. The matter should come down to whether we can find sufficient WP:RS for Marina World, or I would suggest, Marina Mall in Kuwait. The Mall appears to be one of the main features of this development. BTW developments like this often end up in Category:Redeveloped ports and waterfronts, although I can't tell here if there was anything in the area prior, so I'm not adding it. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:09, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If the article can not live up to Wikipedia:Notability, then the result should be delete. I have learned my lesson about A3, I was unsure in the first place if it applied. Carwile2 (talk) 01:55, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:16, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:48, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:40, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Has anyone found any notable sources yet? Carwile2 ^{*Shoot me a message*} 16:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If this shopping mall counts as a company/organisation, then this should definitely be a speedy delete under A7, but I'm not sure if that can happen after the start of AfD. This place is clearly non-notable, and has no 3rd party sources. It is pretty much an advert, and indeed it is written somewhat like one (although thats hard to judge based on the single sentence that makes up the article). While A3 does not apply as there is (a very small amount of) content, this is still a definite delete. Benboy00 (talk) 21:03, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per Benboy ... I don't see sufficient indicia of notability.--Epeefleche (talk) 21:08, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.