Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marina Izola

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 03:36, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marina Izola[edit]

See talkpage of the article DaSch (talk) 20:05, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 23:37, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment expand criteria please. Not able to understand why this is being deleted. --Balloholic (talk) 16:35, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Very Weak keep This seems a large marina, but it will absolutely need at least some 3rd party sources. DGG (talk) 22:49, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:55, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:41, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The talk page comment is: "URV translation from de.wp, not relevant, transfer information to Izola". Apparently the article was deleted in the German (de) Wikipedia after the material was worked into Izola. Someone should explain the GFDL to them. - Mgm|^(talk) 00:40, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep 3rd largest port in Slovenia (although that doesn't say much by itself, considering how small Slovene coast is :P). Some basic info can be found on World Port Source, a little more detailed description is on Pagine Azzure (Italian only) - that from 5 minutes searching for "Port Izola" on Google. --Yerpo (talk) 08:47, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless some secondary sources to prove notability are added. MilborneOne (talk) 22:31, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.