Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marily Mojica

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 01:35, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marily Mojica[edit]

Marily Mojica (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

GNG and WP:ARTIST fail. Notability here is very minor. Article contains many sources, the vast majority of which are either event announcements, not independent or trivial. The Washington Post is just name check. An external search returned zero sources from the web, news or books. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:03, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. ~ Amory (utc) 03:31, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ~ Amory (utc) 03:31, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. ~ Amory (utc) 03:31, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Puerto Rico-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:56, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Coverage appears to be exclusively in local press. El Tiempo Latino might be a solid source as a publication of the Washington Post, but coverage is limited to mention of her name in a list of twenty-six. The leaflet for a discussion at the Silver Spring Town Center has extended coverage of her, but it's in the first person, so not independent. I don't see, and can't find, any evidence of the one-person exhibitions in museums or institutions, or of works held in notable collections, that would indicate that she should have a page here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:07, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as I also could not find significant coverage. MidwestSalamander (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete due to lack of sustained coverage in independent reliable sources. -Lopifalko (talk) 15:13, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.