Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marilú López

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC(talk) 06:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marilú López[edit]

Marilú López (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Resumé article of no value on a subject who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. A before search shows links to user generated sources and other sources not independent of her. The ref-bombing is a mirage to make the article appear as though it were notable. The article in itself doesn’t even indicate how or why she is notable. Celestina007 (talk) 02:19, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 02:19, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 02:19, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 02:19, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 02:19, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 02:19, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


The reason established by Celestina007 for deletion was:

"Resumé article of no value on a subject who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. A before search shows links to user generated sources and other sources not independent of her. The ref-bombing is a mirage to make the article appear as though it were notable. The article in itself doesn’t even indicate how or why she is notable."

The main reason why I consider her notable is due to her work for the Data Management Association through the foundation of the Mexican Chapter, then her role as Regional Coordinator for Latin America, and currently as President's Council Chair.

While DAMA might not be the considered a mainstream organization, there are several people related to DAMA with articles on Wikipedia:

Any suggestions on how to improve this article are welcomed. lpgomar (talk) 03:03, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Beautiful individual who has an important and influential role but does not meet the notability criteria as laid out in WP:N and found conducting a WP:BEFORE search. --ARoseWolf (Talk) 21:04, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete does not meet the inclusion criteria for Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a reliable source, thus the existence of other articles does not actually demonstrate there subject is notable, so we do not keep articles just because people with similar jobs also have articles.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:28, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: agree with user generated sources and other sources not independent of her ... none of this meets notability required for notability. --Whiteguru (talk) 05:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.