Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marija Ritonja

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NorthAmerica1000 23:38, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Marija Ritonja[edit]

Marija Ritonja (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probable hoax, certainly completely unverifiable. No sources exist for this person, never mind the claim that she was an illegitimate child of Nicholas I of Montenegro. Article creator already has had three other articles on this royal house deleted.

Also nominated is Elizabeta Bratusha, the equally unverifiable child of Marija Ritonja, who married an equally elusive Anthon Bratusha von Friedau, and is the mother of e.g. the completely unverifiable "Princess Marta Kerschbach", wife of the untraceable "Prince Joseph Kerschbach". At best, this is a real family who make some extreme-fringe royalty claims. At worst and most probably, a complete hoax. Fram (talk) 12:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 12:35, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 12:36, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:N, WP:V, WP:GNG and a host of other stuff. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:17, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete since it is without references and I can't find any. LaMona (talk) 22:49, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, unverifiable content with no reliable sources. — Joaquin008 (talk) 15:24, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.