Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariela Anchipi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:20, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mariela Anchipi[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mariela Anchipi

BLP that does not satisfy any notability guideline as written. An article should speak for itself, and this does not establish notability. In particular, the article does not establish general notability, entertainment notability, or musical notability. The article also has tone problems and content problems. It appears to have been written for fans of the subject, and contains too much trivia and gossip; if it established notability, it would need to be trimmed of non-encyclopedic material, but it doesn't establish notability. It also contains too much indiscriminate information.

It should not be necessary to review 27 references, or 22 references, because 5 of the notes are annotations rather than references. However, the references have been checked, and none of them present significant secondary coverage:

Number	Reference	Remarks	Independent	Significant	Reliable	Secondary
1		An annotation, not a reference.
2		An annotation, not a reference.
3	Infobae.com	A story about her wedding.	No	No	?	No
4	Infobae.com	Appears to be a fan story	No	No	?	?
5	ciudad.com.ar	Celebrity gossip	Yes	Yes?	?	No
6	ciudad.com.ar	Description of a show - Doesnt mention the subject	Yes	No	?	No
7	lavoz.com.ar	Paywalled	?	?	?	?
8	elterritorio.com.ar	Celebrity gossip	Yes	No	?	No
9	clarin.com	Coverage of a sexual harassment case in which she was one of multiple complainants	Yes	No	?	No
10	miafm.cienradios.com	A celebrity profile	No	No	?	No
11	ciudad.com.ar	Discussion of whether she has had cosmetic surgery	No	No	?	No
12	radiomitre.cienradios.com	Interview with subject	No	No	?	No
13	eltrecetv.com.ar	Another interview	No	No	?	No
14	rionegro.com.ar	Account of a reality show that she was in	Yes	No	?	No
15	infobae.com	Account of a reality show that she was in	Yes	No	?	No
16	diarioshow.com	Another reality show account	Yes	No	?	No
17	eltrecetv.com.ar	Another reality show account	Yes	No	?	No
18	lanacion.com.ar	Interview with the subject	No	Yes	?	No
19		An annotation, not a reference.
20		An annotation, not a reference.
21		An annotation, not a reference.
22	pizzabypizzaparty.com.ar	An ad for pizza and a passing mention	No	Yes	?	No
23	lanacion.com.ar	An article about a show, passing mention	Yes	No	?	No
24	YouTube		No	No	No
25	espectaculosdeaca.com.ar	An article about a show, passing mention	Yes	No	?	No
26	radiocut.fm	Quotes from the subject	No	No	?	No
27	radiomitre.cienradios.com	Interview with subject	No	No	?	No

The originator created this BLP in both draft space and article space, possibly in order to game the system by making it impossible to draftify the article. The originator then redirected the draft to article space. It is not impossible to delete the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:54, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:54, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Dance-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:54, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:54, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but i don't understand if i have to delete 24 references or i have to change it, but what you tell me i will do it with the article. 213.94.15.99 (talk) 11:34, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. I've been trawling through this editor's other recent creations, none of which follows Wikipedia guidelines. Deb (talk) 21:20, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. There is nothing to satisfy WP:GNG. JoyStick101 (talk) 05:58, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.