Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marie Wiseborn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:36, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marie Wiseborn[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

AFD as PROD is likely to be contested. Not notable enough for inclusion to Wikipedia. Searches showed that she existed, but being a fiancee of someone famous is not enough to pass the WP:GNG. Aside from being the fiancee of Moses Bliss, there are no other notability of the subject of the article. Thank you. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:57, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Law, and Christianity. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:49, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Per nom, nothing in RS about her being a singer, preacher or a known law practitioner. Even this article says that she's known for being someone's fiancé, the subject fails GNG. It also doesn't look like the article can be expanded beyond {{stub}}. dxneo (talk) 05:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: No sigcov of the subject. Her affiliation does not necessarily make her notable. Fails GNG. --Donaldherald (talk) 08:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Speedy Delete - in agreement with the voters above. She was in some gossip rag photos for one day, which is not even remotely close to our notability requirements. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 15:42, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not notable enough as per notability requirements. Her current popularity is due to her engagement with a popular person which in my opinion is not enough at the moment ---MEVOELO (TALK|CONTRIBS) 04:47, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: WP:TOOSOON, also, she's doesn't satisfy WP:GNG or any applicable SNG. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 11:59, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.