Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Ozawa filmography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Ozawa filmography[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A collection of non-notable titles. Significant RS coverage to justify the existence of this list not found. All citations are to primary sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, do not merge. The nominator's assessment is correct. In addition, the guidance at the porn project discourages porn filmographies and suggests providing a link to where the they can be found. At most, a brief and partial list of notable films and career highlights may be included. There are no reliable reliable sources to distinguish these porn films and a full porn filmography would carry undue weight in the actress' article. • Gene93k (talk) 15:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom and @• Gene93k rationale. Quis separabit? 19:14, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete above reasoning, needless list is promo-y. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 22:59, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Gene93k. Poorly sourced/unsourced laundry list of nn videos. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 12:12, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Gene93k, List of nn videos - Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 18:57, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.