Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Ozawa
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep, overwhelmingly. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 02:18, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Maria Ozawa[edit]
Japanese AV model. Hasn't been around long enough to be notable in anyway. -- Koffieyahoo 06:58, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. A quoted Google search yields over a half-million hits. As much as I don't want to sully my contribution record working on a porno actress' article, I'll try to do a little bit of cleanup. - Thorne N. Melcher 11:52, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Thorne N. Melcher. I'm no expert on Japanese AV, but it would seem from the vast amount of info dedicated to her on the web that she is fairly notable in her chosen field. It might just be the "new" factor though increasing the ammount of "chatter" about her... no predjudice against another AfD in the future.--Isotope23 16:12, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, appears to be at least marginally notable in her field. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 18:53, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keepshe's very popular right now, no need to remove her.
Coredesat talk. ^_^ 18:53, 7 August 2006 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.252.66.240 (talk • contribs) [reply] - Keep per Thorne N. Melcher, actress is notable within her field. Yamaguchi先生 23:45, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep She is a famous and notable actress that has made strong impact in the Japanese AV community. I don't see any reason to delete the article. --cholo 00:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- TheFarix (Talk) 02:46, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per others above, and also note 841,000 G-hits on her Japanese name. Neier 22:22, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.