Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Migdalia Perez Soto
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No sources, no article. Sandstein 06:25, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Maria Migdalia Perez Soto[edit]
- Maria Migdalia Perez Soto (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:N and WP:Bio as a non-notable, non-living, ex-spouse of a high level politician of Puerto Rico. The only real claim of notability, in my opinion, is in regards to her work as an interior designer. No references have been provided for the claim or the whole article. My Google New search and my Google News Archives search have also provided no references. OlYellerTalktome 16:43, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:27, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unreferenced, unchanged in 14 days, looks to be a hopeless case. --Mkativerata (talk) 01:52, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Google search comes empty (I really wanted to find sources to verify a fascinating life story). I wonder if the whole thing is a hoax. --Jmundo (talk) 02:51, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Smells like a hoax big-time.--Milowent • talkblp-r 03:36, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.