Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Kekkonen
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Maria Kekkonen[edit]
- Maria Kekkonen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't appear to pass WP:PORNBIO. TheoloJ (talk) 16:19, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't find significant coverage, only a couple of very brief mentions in Finnish News, hence fails WP:GNG Chzz ► 18:30, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:41, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Horrorshowj (talk) 15:29, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep Just added multiple mainstream Finnish news sources with feature articles about Kekkonen introducing pole-dancing to Finland as fitness and dance. There are other refs as well - she seems to be very "notable" in Finland and that should be good enough for us! Cherryblossom1982 (talk) 06:07, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Seems obvious: Notable contribution (introducing pole-dancing to Finland), and sources (in Finnish, of course-- it's a Finnish subject). Thanks to Cherryblossom for finding those sources. Dekkappai (talk) 14:12, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:14, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notability has been demonstrated with significant coverage in reliable sources. WP:ENT ("has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment") would seem more relevant than WP:PORNBIO. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:55, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.