Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Kālī Perotti Mari-Bowyer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:28, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Kālī Perotti Mari-Bowyer[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional, borderline notability, unverified information about whom she represents. The way I think these days that adds up to delete. DGG ( talk ) 00:36, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

all is verified , on the record as well as notable does not qualify for deletion by any means. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.203.238.243 (talk) 22:32, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Has a slight issue with its claims that need to be checked. Such as the "largest award" for the court victory, the claim is not backed by the AP source and constitutes OR, but the victory is cited. Needs a lot of work, but seems possible to meet GNG. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 23:00, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 08:21, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 11:14, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Resume-style fluff bio. Fails GNG. Carrite (talk) 13:56, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - she is just a run of the mill publicist trying to live off the shine of her dead clients; there is not a single reliable source with significant coverage about this nobody. Bearian (talk) 17:44, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.