Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margarita Brender Rubira

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:02, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Margarita Brender Rubira[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not yet convinced of this lady's notability. —S Marshall T/C 09:44, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. —S Marshall T/C 09:44, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 10:00, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon 04:58, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep there are articles about her in several other language wikis, of which ca-wiki has references in Spanish, including this and this. See also this, an archive.org rescue of page in Catalan linked from ro-wiki. The text of the English article looks like a translation of ro-wiki article. HouseOfChange (talk) 18:45, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:58, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: pioneer woman architect, with sources about her in other languages. I've copy-edited the page to make it look a bit tidier. Dsp13 (talk) 22:47, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment per WP:HEY, I suggest the nom withdraw this AfD. HouseOfChange (talk) 14:45, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Definitely meets WP:GNG. -- Dane ^talk 17:57, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article seems to give sufficient sourcing now, so definitely need to be a case of WP:HEY. -Kj cheetham (talk) 08:01, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.