Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Kilgallen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 09:09, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret Kilgallen[edit]

Insufficient assertions of notability. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 06:24, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. She is included in the PBS series "art in the 21st century"[1], together with some 50 other artists; she has had a review in the New York Times[2]. There's also a book about her work[3]. Lots and lots more of links, but this is enough for me to keep the article. Fram 09:59, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

weak delete, based on what is in the article she is not notable but User:Fram's links suggests she might be. Put the evidence in the article and expand it so they are in context and I will reconsider. Thryduulf 10:44, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. per Fram's links, although of course, they need to be included (if need be, contact me to close the AFD and do it myself). - Mgm|^(talk) 11:18, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Fram. Links/further reading added. Angus McLellan (Talk) 09:45, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - No doubt a notable artist that deserves an entry. Just needs more detailed page. 25 September 2006 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.100.210.18 (talk • contribs)
Keep per Fram. Agent 86 22:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.