Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Gel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 07:39, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret Gel[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough in-depth coverage about her to show she passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:52, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:14, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:14, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disability-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: As I said in the proposed deletion: "No indication of notability per WP:BIO or WP:GNG. The sources provided are not about her, but she is only mentioned. I am unable to find multiple reliable sources with significant discussion of the individual." ... discospinster _talk 15:04, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unfortunately the article doesn't meet the GNG because it doesn't have significant coverage about youtuber. And she has few views on Youtube. Although views are not necessarily an objective criterion for notability, it's an indication that she is a little-known person. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 19:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — SIGCOV simply isn’t met. Celestina007 (talk) 03:09, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, subject is simply not notable. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 08:54, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no SIGCOV.--Mvqr (talk) 10:47, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No indepth sources available. fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 05:10, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.