Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Devaney

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can be draftified or userfied for improvement via WP:REFUND. Sandstein 13:47, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret Devaney[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Has not been subject to much media coverage by reliable sources. Only claim of notability is surviving the titanic's sinking, which is not enough. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:45, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 00:09, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 00:09, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 00:09, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 00:09, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify I know it's been sitting here languishing for a long time, but maybe see if it's possible to find more sources? From the bio here it looks like there might have been significant coverage in the 50s? Got here from list of women-related. valereee (talk) 11:47, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable survivor of the Titanic. Nothing makes Devaney more notable than the other 705 survivors, and I doubt anyone thinks we should have articles on all 706 survivors.John Pack Lambert (talk) 07:19, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.