Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Clark (politician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 04:57, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Margaret Clark (politician)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnotable politician holding unnotable positions in a small city. While the subject does have some media coverage, I don't believe that any of it meets WP:SIGCOV, therefore failing WP:GNG and WP:NPOL. Previously nominated in the 48-article bundle at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fidel Vargas, closed as procedural keep due to the bundle's size. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 04:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep- I found this [1] and [2]Wasilatlovekesy (talk) 06:41, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As Shaws username said, those two sources are not independent of the subject and therefore do not contribute towards notability. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 22:07, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing remotely notable. Xxanthippe (talk) 08:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Delete, all the secondary sources are WP:ROTM for any local politician and not enough to establish WP:NOTABILITY or significant coverage per WP:POLITICIAN. The two links above are both from bodies that she was a member of and not secondary sources. Shaws username (talk) 13:26, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 18:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails NPOL and not otherwise notable. SportingFlyer T·C 00:16, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.