Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus Pettersson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:38, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Pettersson[edit]

Marcus Pettersson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not contain any references showing that the person is notable. Scottsadventure (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This and all the other ice hockey players listed below play for a professional team in the top tier, as referenced in the articles, therefore guideline indicates they are notable - see WP:NHOCKEY Acb314 (talk) 00:54, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Lazy creation of a page (would be an insult to call this an article) and, frankly, an embarrassment to this project. I wonder if the article creator will put even the slightest effort into turning this into a useful article? As it stands, this barely surpasses the threshold to save it from an A7 speedy deletion. But not by much. Resolute 01:27, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Keep - Meets criterion 1 of NHOCKEY, with Pettersson having played two games in the Swedish Hockey League, universally considered to be one of the highest-level leagues in the world. I have seen plenty of stubs in a far more deplorable state than this one, and the short length of the article does not justify its deletion. --Hockeyben (talk - contribs) 03:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Keep - per NHOCKEY criterion 1. Could however need an expansion.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:19, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: I agree with Resolute's assessment, but from the earliest notability criteria set forth on Wikipedia for athletes, playing so much as a single game for a top-level, top-ranked professional sports league has been considered sufficient evidence for notability. If the nom is ignorant of the NSPORTS criteria as well as the requirements of WP:BEFORE -- as the several other now-withdrawn AfDs he made suggests -- he shouldn't be making AfD nominations until such time as he is. Ravenswing 14:09, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.