Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marco Pasqua

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. czar  05:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Marco Pasqua[edit]

Marco Pasqua (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet GNG EBY (talk) 05:17, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:15, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:15, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 12:01, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 12:01, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 12:02, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. This is promotional and the subject lacks notability. Tchaliburton (talk) 18:02, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Promotional, and relying entirely on primary and/or unreliable sources with not a shred of WP:RS coverage in sight. No prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can write a good and properly sourced version, but Wikipedia is not a place where anybody's entitled to keep a promotional profile. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 22:35, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.