Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcello Ruta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:59, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marcello Ruta[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable researcher. Although he is highly cited in a highly cited field, he has no remarkable achievements. His profile: [1] Broc (talk) 14:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Science, and Italy. Broc (talk) 14:20, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I don't think that paleontology is such a high citation field: looking at other paleontologists, this is a solid citation record. The article is a stub, but at least not overly promotional, primary sourced, etc. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 16:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 19:39, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - here's his University of Lincoln profile --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 21:05, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. We have done this before. Except in very rare cases, associate professors are not notable. Bearian (talk) 17:23, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is yet another example of WP:TOOSOON to fully meet WP:NPROF. Probably will be notable in the fullness of time, but not yet. Qflib (talk) 18:41, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.