Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcello Barra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 02:13, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marcello Barra[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unnotable. Links go to subject's website and the home pages of a university and and government ministry. The only Google hits for the book are wikipedia and mirrors. — Blue-Haired Lawyer 03:08, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: notability not established. Nice CV, but not worth an article.--Karljoos (talk) 12:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. He presented at a conference: http://www.cibersociedad.net/congres2009/en/perfil/6724/marcello-cavalcanti-barra The British Library has a copy of his 1995 book, but Worldcat doesn't list any other library that does. He had a book launch event. I didn't find any reviews. Google Books has four hits, none of which seem terribly promising: http://books.google.com/books?um=1&cf=all&ned=ca&hl=en&q=%22Marcello%20Cavalcanti%20Barra%22&sa=N&tab=np Google Scholar has these eight hits for Marcello Cavalcanti Barra: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Marcello+Cavalcanti+Barra%22&hl=en&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2001&as_sdtp=on and 14 for Marcello Barra: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22Marcello+Barra%22&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0 and 62 (many of which are other people) for MC Barra: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=%22MC+Barra%22&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0 Unless someone can salvage notability from the Google Scholar hits, I don't think notability can be shown. - Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:34, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. — Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:34, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Karljoos. He has published some books just like many other schollar. On the top of that, the article lacks of WP:RS. Lechatjaune (talk) 17:54, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.