Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcella Araica

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:23, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Marcella Araica[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems like an open and shut case for failing WP:Music. Page has numerous issues, but failing notability seems the most pertinent. ASCAP awards do not seem to confer required notability. Rayman60 (talk) 00:19, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor ^Talk! 09:19, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. — Sam Sailor ^Talk! 09:19, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I guess this is going to hinge on whether the ASCAP awards are considered notable or not. There are at least two reliable sources in there, the Sound on Sound article and the Billboard news article (a dead link on the Wikipedia article but archived here). Richard3120 (talk) 17:12, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The total sum of coverage seems to be niche publications dedicated to her professional field, and coverage of the awards ceremony via Billboard which would be a more reasonably general title. None of this is enough to suggest she's prominent enough in her relatively minor field, which surely places below songwriter and producer in the hierarchy of importance, and we routinely delete those. KaisaL (talk) 03:46, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:21, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:57, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She is important in her field and recognized as such by Mix Magazine and Pro Sound News. She was interviewed in Billboard and profiled by Black Enterprise. I've added sources to the article which include books, journals and news. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:11, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to add that she's in The Huffington Post and in M Music and Musicians magazine. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:19, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: She's an engineer, not a performer. So "niche publications dedicated to her professional field" clearly constitutes significant coverage in multiple sources independent of the subject. And an ASCAP award is a major award for someone in a technical field. These folks who work behind the scenes probably have more brains and talent than most of the performers they work with. Credit long overdue, IMHO. Montanabw^(talk) 16:09, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.