Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcel Danis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was I'd hate to accuse another user of making a bad faith nom, so call it a snowball keep as MP's are inherently notable. User:Dlohcierekim
Marcel Danis[edit]
AfDs for this article:
- Marcel Danis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
non-notable person and fails WP:Notability guidelines Oaktreebrand (talk) 16:07, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep WP:POLITICIAN says that members of a national legislature are notable. Not only was this man in the Canadian Parliament: he was in the government. I'm wondering if this is a bad faith nomination. Nyttend (talk) 20:34, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep per Nyttend. This guy wasn't just an MP, he was also a member of the Cabinet. This is roughly analogous to nominating Lloyd Bentsen or Mo Mowlam. --NellieBly (talk) 22:43, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep - clearly notable. Possible disruptive nomination. Newly registered editor who also removed entries from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 August 13. -- Whpq (talk) 15:55, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.